Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11366/348
Title: | ACUMEN: A Multi-Dimensional Researcher Portfolio. Evaluation Standards and their Dilemmas | Authors: | Wouters, Paul | Keywords: | research evaluation;evaluation criteria;research assessment;science indicators;metrics;quatitative vs qualitative evaluation;interoperability | Issue Date: | 12-Nov-2014 | Publisher: | euroCRIS | Series/Report no.: | euroCRIS Strategic Membership Meeting Autumn 2014 (KNAW, Amsterdam, Nov 11-12, 2014) | Conference: | Strategic Membership Meeting 2014 – Autumn (Amsterdam) | Abstract: | The presentation addresses the need to improve current research evaluation practices and argues that quantitative evaluation strategies based on network analysis, text mining and visualisation techniques should be used as a complement to traditional qualitative evaluation. Such improvement on evaluation techniques should strongly benefit from the standardised environment arising from an ever growing system interoperability, while at the same time the ACUMEN project proposes empowering researchers through a tailor-made evaluation process. |
Description: | 26 slides.-- Presentation delivered at the session "Developments in Research Monitoring, Evaluation and Benchmarking" |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/11366/348 |
Appears in Collections: | Conference |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
ACUMEN_Paul_Wouters_CWTS.pptx | 4.34 MB | Microsoft Powerpoint XML | View/Open |
Page view(s) 50
290
checked on Apr 17, 2024
Download(s) 50
186
checked on Apr 17, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are offered under a CC-BY 4.0 licence unless otherwise indicated