Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11366/216
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPinto, Carlos Sousa-
dc.contributor.authorSimões, Cláudia-
dc.contributor.authorAmaral, Luis-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-04T19:23:06Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-04T19:23:06Z-
dc.date.issued2014-05-15-
dc.identifier.citation"Managing Data-Intensive Science: the Role of Research Information Systems in Realising the Digital Agenda": Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Current Research Information Systems (2014)en_US
dc.identifier.citationProcedia Computer Science 33: 80-85 (2014)-
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.procs.2014.06.013-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11366/216-
dc.descriptionDelivered at the CRIS2014 Conference in Rome; published in Procedia Computer Science 33 (Jul 2014).-- 6 pages.en_US
dc.description.abstractGovernments and organizations are creating Current Research Information Systems (CRIS) to follow the growth of the amount of research data, providing tools to collect, preserve and disseminate that data. At the same time, we are facing the appearance of standards designed to regulate CRIS development. Common European Research Information Format (CERIF) is a standard for managing and exchanging research data. There are several types of CRIS – institutional, regional, national and international. In this work we have just considered the national and international types and 43 CRIS of those types were identified worldwide. Only 5 of them are CERIF-compliant. The aim of this study is to conclude if the use of CERIF is increasing the number of features in CRIS. Based on our methodology, we analyzed 10 CRIS, 4 of which CERIF-compliant. CERIF tends to increase similarities between CRIS, in terms of its features and its data models. However, the need for customization of such systems leads to various implementations of the standard, creating an opposite effect of the one referred before. Non CERIF-compliant CRISs have as central focus the researchers. The CERIF takes CRIS to focus also on projects and institutions of the research domain. With this exception, the CERIF doesn’t show an increase of the number of features. We also consider the use of Dublin Core to increase interoperability between CRIS.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publishereuroCRISen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCRIS2014: 12th International Conference on Current Research Information Systems (Rome, May 13-15, 2014)-
dc.subjectCERIFen_US
dc.subjectcurrent research information systemsen_US
dc.subjectmetadata standardsen_US
dc.subjectDublin Coreen_US
dc.titleCERIF – Is the standard helping to improve CRIS?en_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.06.013-
dc.relation.conferenceCRIS2014 Conferenceen
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeConference Paper-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
Appears in Collections:Conference
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
26_Pinto Sousa, Simões, Amaral_fin.pdfpost-print version299.45 kBAdobe PDF
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s) 50

386
checked on Apr 17, 2024

Download(s) 5

677
checked on Apr 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are offered under a CC-BY 4.0 licence unless otherwise indicated