Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11366/601
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMennielli, Micheleen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-03T19:52:01Z-
dc.date.available2017-11-03T19:52:01Z-
dc.date.issued2017-10-25-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11366/601-
dc.description33 slides.-- Presentation delivered at the FORCE2017 Conference (Berlin, Oct 25-27, 2017).-- OCLC slides by Rebecca Bryant.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe scholarly communications ecosystem has experienced rapid change in recent years, driven by political, technological, and network influences. Cultural changes usually have strong technological implications and the research and scholarly ecosystem is not an exception. Additionally, the research domain has a great variety of stakeholders using different tools and software to manage complex and diverse tasks, activities and workflows, such as collecting data on publications; supporting researchers in their daily activities; satisfying requirements of funding agencies; granting access to data and publications; enhancing visibility and strengthening national and international collaborations.en_US
dc.description.abstractAn attempt to understand and analyze the ecosystem was led by euroCRIS and EUNIS in 2016. The two European Organizations launched a survey focused on the use of Current Research Information System (CRIS) and Institutional Repository (IR) among European universities and research institutes, and their level of technological interoperability. More recently, euroCRIS has partnered with OCLC Research to conduct a survey of research information management practices at universities and research institutes worldwide.-
dc.description.abstractThe OCLC-euroCRIS survey is intended to inform the research community about the goals, purposes, and scope of research information management practices, including the creation of institutional registries of research outputs, awards/grants management, academic activity reporting workflows, as well as publicly available researcher expertise profiles. It will tell us more about how institutions are currently addressing the challenges and complexities related to research information management, and it will also provide valuable insights into national and regional practices.-
dc.description.abstractWe are particularly interested in examining differing stakeholder roles within the research information management ecosystem, knowledge that can help lead to more efficient workflows, adoption of standards, and interoperability.-
dc.description.abstractIn this presentation, we will share the outcomes of the analysis conducted in 2016 and we will provide a progress report on the global survey, which is expected to launch in late 2017.-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publishereuroCRISen_US
dc.subjectcurrent research information systemsen_US
dc.subjectresearch information managementen_US
dc.subjectscholarly communicationsen_US
dc.subjectsurveysen_US
dc.subjecteuroCRISen_US
dc.subjectOCLCen_US
dc.subjectsystem interoperabilityen_US
dc.subjectresearch information management ecosystemen_US
dc.titleOCLC-euroCRIS Joint Survey of Research Information Management Practicesen_US
dc.typePresentationen_US
dc.relation.conferenceFORCE2017en_US
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Outreach: Conference
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
OCLC-euroCRIS joint Survey of Research Informationa Management Practices_@FORCE11 2017_Oct 2017.pdfPDF presentation6.19 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

220
Last Week
3
Last month
4
checked on Nov 12, 2019

Download(s)

53
checked on Nov 12, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in the euroCRIS DSpace-CRIS are offered under a CC-BY licence unless otherwise indicated.