Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11366/661
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVancauwenbergh, Sadiaen_US
dc.contributor.authorPoelmans, Hanneen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-09T13:38:19Z-
dc.date.available2018-05-09T13:38:19Z-
dc.date.issued2018-06-14-
dc.identifier.citation"FAIRness of Research Information": Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Current Research Information Systems (CRIS2018)-
dc.identifier.citationProcedia Computer Science 146: 265-278 (2019)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11366/661-
dc.descriptionPresentation delivered at the CRIS2018 Conference Umeå within parallel session 6 "Models and Data Integration I"en_US
dc.descriptionContains extended abstract accepted at the conference and presentation (24 slides) delivered at the event-
dc.description.abstractIn 2011, a report was written by Peters et al. on the administrative simplification of research reporting in Flanders. Next to the description of several data flows that could be harmonized, validated and merged into CRIS systems, the report also contained important recommendations on the use of common standards and classifications that could lead to more efficient and qualitative research information (systems) and thus more efficient research reporting. As such, in Flanders several classifications are used in research reporting, i.e. research discipline codes are used for denoting a researcher’s discipline, while financial codes are used for reporting on the funding type, and technology and publication codes are used for depicting innovation sectors and publication types respectively,...en_US
dc.description.abstractNext to the variety of classification schemes itself, each classification scheme has multiple classification lists depending on the authority to whom a researcher is obliged to report. This has led in the past to the existence of several research discipline lists for a region as small as Flanders. Therefore, one of the most important recommendations of the report by Peters et al. (2011) was the creation of a single research discipline code list that could be used to tag information inside CRIS systems for reporting, dissemination and visualisation purposes. The uniform definition and management of the semantics of this research discipline code list for all research actors in Flanders could have an immediate impact on the accuracy of reporting and the policy pursued on the basis thereof. In addition, such managed classification systems can be used in dynamic research information systems that drastically reduce the administrative burden of the research population, which automatically entails an important investment in research and innovation.-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publishereuroCRISen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCRIS2018: 14th International Conference on Current Research Information Systems (Umeå, June 13-16, 2018)-
dc.subjectresearch information managementen_US
dc.subjectclassification schemesen_US
dc.subjectresearch disciplinesen_US
dc.subjectharmonisationen_US
dc.subjectFlanders-
dc.titleThe creation of the Flemish research discipline list, a huge step forward in harmonizing research information (systems)en_US
dc.typePresentationen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.01.075-
dc.relation.conferenceCRIS2018 – Umeåen_US
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypePresentation-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
Appears in Collections:Conference
Files in This Item:
Show simple item record

Page view(s) 20

540
checked on Mar 27, 2024

Download(s) 20

469
checked on Mar 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are offered under a CC-BY 4.0 licence unless otherwise indicated