The (mis)alignment of Open Science and research evaluation: addressing complexity with existing resources and context-sensitive evaluation

Author(s)
Keywords

open science

research assessment

openness profile

evaluative inquiry

evaluation criteria

Issue Date
November 28, 2018
Publisher
euroCRIS
Type
Presentation
Abstract
The presentation addresses the misalignment between the principles of Open Science and the current mechanisms for research evaluation, which do not accurately capture the aspects that should reward Open Science practitioners. An overview is first provided of the present Open Science policy context both at an European and a national level in the Netherlands. The concept of Openness Profile is introduced, devised by a Knowledge Exchange working group as a means to capture good Open Science practice at a bottom level. Finally, an 'Evaluative Inquiry' approach is proposed as an alternative research evaluation framework that captures Open Science practice by changing the assessment methodology.
Description
23 slides.-- Presentation delivered within the Jostein Hauge session as part of the slot devoted to 'Research evaluation and P-O-PF information exchange: updates from the Netherlands'
URI
https://dspacecris.eurocris.org/handle/11366/719
DOI
File(s)
Thumbnail Image
Name

TATUM_de Rijcke_The (mis)alignment of Open Science and research evaluation_euroCRIS_Warsaw_28Nov2018.pdf

Description
PDF presentation
Size

6.9 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

0c1537f19cef883fc816e7a5d03da44b