Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Research Classifications: Three major principles
Authors: Güdler, Jürgen 
Keywords: research classifications;characterisation;Germany
Issue Date: 19-Nov-2019
Publisher: euroCRIS
Series/Report no.: Autumn 2019 euroCRIS Strategic Membership Meeting (WWU Münster, Germany, Nov 18-20, 2019)
Conference: Strategic Membership Meeting 2019 – Autumn (Münster) 
In the discussion about research classifications, there is often the argument that these should be as universally applicable as possible - even in detail. In my presentation, however, I would like to highlight other characteristics. In short, a good subject classification satisfies the following requirements:
- It is structured hierarchically whereas (1) at its finest level, it meets the needs of the respective institution (which can be very specific) and (2) on the highest levels it is compatible to international standards (esp. Frascati).
- There are clear rules as to which objects are to be classified (e.g. Projects, People, Institutes)
- There are defined processes that make a regular revision of the classification possible
The presentation illustrates these three principles using the example of the two main classification systems used in Germany by the Federal Statistical Office (DESTATIS) and the German Research Foundation (DFG).
20 slides.-- Presentation delivered within the session on "Research classifications"
Appears in Collections:Conference

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
euroCRIS_MuensterSMM_Guedler_classifications_20191119.pdfPDF presentation2.03 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

Last Week
Last month
checked on Sep 20, 2021


checked on Sep 20, 2021

Google ScholarTM


Items in DSpace are offered under a CC-BY 4.0 licence unless otherwise indicated