Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11366/226
Title: | A comparison of research output counting methods using a national CRIS – effects at the institutional level | Authors: | Chudlarský, Tomáš Dvořák, Jan Souček, Martin |
Keywords: | research information management;bibliometrics;counting methods;indicators;current research information systems | Issue Date: | 14-May-2014 | Publisher: | euroCRIS | Source: | "Managing Data-Intensive Science: the Role of Research Information Systems in Realising the Digital Agenda": Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Current Research Information Systems (2014) Procedia Computer Science 33: 147-152 (2014) |
Series/Report no.: | CRIS2014: 12th International Conference on Current Research Information Systems (Rome, May 13-15, 2014) | Conference: | CRIS2014 Conference | Abstract: | Recent decades have seen a trend towards scientific publications with many authors. There is not an agreed way of counting coauthored publications. This research in progress contribution compares the behaviour of four representative methods of counting research outputs. We present differences between those methods of counting evaluated at the level of whole universities, their faculties, or non-university research institutes. Our study uses publication metadata from a national CRIS. |
Description: | Delivered at the CRIS2014 Conference in Rome; published in Procedia Computer Science 33 (Jul 2014).-- 6 pages. |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/11366/226 | DOI: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.06.024 |
Appears in Collections: | Conference |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
48_Chudlarsky_Dvorak_Soucek_CRIS2014_Rome.pdf | post-print version | 207.84 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page view(s) 5
684
checked on Mar 27, 2024
Download(s) 10
525
checked on Mar 27, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are offered under a CC-BY 4.0 licence unless otherwise indicated