Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: A comparison of research output counting methods using a national CRIS – effects at the institutional level
Authors: Chudlarský, Tomáš 
Dvořák, Jan 
Souček, Martin 
Keywords: research information management;bibliometrics;counting methods;indicators;current research information systems
Issue Date: 14-May-2014
Publisher: euroCRIS
Source: "Managing Data-Intensive Science: the Role of Research Information Systems in Realising the Digital Agenda": Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Current Research Information Systems (2014)
Procedia Computer Science 33: 147-152 (2014)
Series/Report no.: CRIS2014: 12th International Conference on Current Research Information Systems (Rome, May 13-15, 2014)
Conference: CRIS2014 Conference 
Recent decades have seen a trend towards scientific publications with many authors. There is not an agreed way of counting coauthored publications. This research in progress contribution compares the behaviour of four representative methods of counting
research outputs. We present differences between those methods of counting evaluated at the level of whole universities, their
faculties, or non-university research institutes. Our study uses publication metadata from a national CRIS.
Delivered at the CRIS2014 Conference in Rome; published in Procedia Computer Science 33 (Jul 2014).-- 6 pages.
Appears in Collections:Conference

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
48_Chudlarsky_Dvorak_Soucek_CRIS2014_Rome.pdfpost-print version207.84 kBAdobe PDF
Show full item record

Page view(s) 5

checked on Jul 20, 2024

Download(s) 10

checked on Jul 20, 2024

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are offered under a CC-BY 4.0 licence unless otherwise indicated