Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11366/226
Title: A comparison of research output counting methods using a national CRIS – effects at the institutional level
Authors: Chudlarský, Tomáš 
Dvořák, Jan 
Souček, Martin 
Keywords: research information management
bibliometrics
counting methods
indicators
current research information systems
Issue Date: 14-May-2014
Publisher: euroCRIS
Source: "Managing Data-Intensive Science: the Role of Research Information Systems in Realising the Digital Agenda": Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Current Research Information Systems (2014)
Procedia Computer Science 33: 147-152 (2014)
Series/Report no.: CRIS2014: 12th International Conference on Current Research Information Systems (Rome, May 13-15, 2014)
Conference: CRIS2014 Conference 
Abstract: Recent decades have seen a trend towards scientific publications with many authors. There is not an agreed way of counting coauthored publications. This research in progress contribution compares the behaviour of four representative methods of counting research outputs. We present differences between those methods of counting evaluated at the level of whole universities, their faculties, or non-university research institutes. Our study uses publication metadata from a national CRIS.
Description: Delivered at the CRIS2014 Conference in Rome; published in Procedia Computer Science 33 (Jul 2014).-- 6 pages.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11366/226
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.06.024
Appears in Collections:Conference

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
48_Chudlarsky_Dvorak_Soucek_CRIS2014_Rome.pdfpost-print version207.84 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

473
Last Week
5
Last month
8
checked on Nov 12, 2019

Download(s)

349
checked on Nov 12, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in the euroCRIS DSpace-CRIS are offered under a CC-BY licence unless otherwise indicated.