A comparison of research output counting methods using a national CRIS – effects at the institutional level
Author(s)
Issue Date
May 14, 2014
Publisher
euroCRIS
Source
"Managing Data-Intensive Science: the Role of Research Information Systems in Realising the Digital Agenda": Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Current Research Information Systems (2014)
Procedia Computer Science 33: 147-152 (2014)
Type
Conference Paper
Abstract
Recent decades have seen a trend towards scientific publications with many authors. There is not an agreed way of counting coauthored publications. This research in progress contribution compares the behaviour of four representative methods of counting
research outputs. We present differences between those methods of counting evaluated at the level of whole universities, their
faculties, or non-university research institutes. Our study uses publication metadata from a national CRIS.
Description
Delivered at the CRIS2014 Conference in Rome; published in Procedia Computer Science 33 (Jul 2014).-- 6 pages.
URI
https://dspacecris.eurocris.org/handle/11366/226
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Name
48_Chudlarsky_Dvorak_Soucek_CRIS2014_Rome.pdf
Description
post-print version
Size
207.84 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
fa82685e12379c459c03faf117ba4875
Conference(s)