Pros and Cons for PIDs on Research Information System Registries (DRIS)
Author(s)
Issue Date
March 20, 2024
Publisher
euroCRIS
Source
De-Castro P (2024). Pros and Cons for PIDs on Research Information System Registries (DRIS). PID Network Germany Workshop on PIDs for Open Access Publication Services and Research Information Management Systems (Bielefeld, 20. Mar 2024). http://hdl.handle.net/11366/2522
Type
Presentation
Abstract
The presentation explores the role of Research Information Management Systems -- and national and regional CRIS in particular -- in the adoption and implementation of various persistent identifiers (PIDs). Some challenges and opportunities posed by the current PID landscape are described and examples are provided for PID implementation initiatives by different national and regional CRIS (Finland, Norway, Portugal, Flanders) in the areas of author IDs, organisation IDs, grant IDs and PIDs for research instrument and facilities. The use of PIDs in CRIS registries like the euroCRIS Directory of Research Information Systems (DRIS) is also analysed, examining the pros and cons of the possible use of DOIs to identify CRIS records that may often be subject to changes.
Description
29 slides.-- Keynote delivered at the Mar 20th, 2024 Workshop on PIDs for Open Access Publication Services and Research Information Management Systems held by the PID Network Deutschland project at the University of Bielefeld
Event description and programme available at: https://www.pid-network.de/neuigkeiten/blog/workshop-pids-fuer-oa-publikationsdienste-fis
URI
https://dspacecris.eurocris.org/handle/11366/2522
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Name
PID-Network-Deutschland-presentation-PdC_20240320.pdf
Description
PDF presentation
Size
2.96 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
b667e49f7cd6b664427ecdcadce93a1e