Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: ACUMEN: A Multi-Dimensional Researcher Portfolio. Evaluation Standards and their Dilemmas
Authors: Wouters, Paul 
Keywords: research evaluation
evaluation criteria
research assessment
science indicators
quatitative vs qualitative evaluation
Issue Date: 12-Nov-2014
Publisher: euroCRIS
Series/Report no.: euroCRIS Strategic Membership Meeting Autumn 2014 (KNAW, Amsterdam, Nov 11-12, 2014)
Conference: Strategic Membership Meeting 2014 – Autumn (Amsterdam) 
Abstract: The presentation addresses the need to improve current research evaluation practices and argues that quantitative evaluation strategies based on network analysis, text mining and visualisation techniques should be used as a complement to traditional qualitative evaluation. Such improvement on evaluation techniques should strongly benefit from the standardised environment arising from an ever growing system interoperability, while at the same time the ACUMEN project proposes empowering researchers through a tailor-made evaluation process.
Description: 26 slides.-- Presentation delivered at the session "Developments in Research Monitoring, Evaluation and Benchmarking"
Appears in Collections:Conference

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ACUMEN_Paul_Wouters_CWTS.pptx4.34 MBMicrosoft Powerpoint XMLView/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

Last Week
Last month
checked on Nov 19, 2019


checked on Nov 19, 2019

Google ScholarTM


Items in the euroCRIS DSpace-CRIS are offered under a CC-BY licence unless otherwise indicated.