Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLunn, Brian Kirkegaard-
dc.contributor.authorMelchiorsen, Poul M.-
dc.contributor.authorThidemann, Nils-
dc.contributor.authorKruuse, John-
dc.contributor.authorHøj, Anne Lyhne-
dc.contributor.authorDreier, Sabine-
dc.contributor.authorMadsen, Maria A.-
dc.contributor.authorJensen, Anne Marya-
dc.identifier.citationKeith G. Jeffery, Jan Dvořák (eds.), "e-Infrastructures for Research and Innovation Linking Information Systems to Improve Scientific Knowledge Production": Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Current Research Information Systems (2012), p. 233-242en_US
dc.descriptionPresented at the CRIS2012 Conference in Prague.-- 10 pages.-- Full conference programme available at:
dc.description.abstractIn this article we describe the results from a study of researchers’ publishing activity at one Danish university before and after the implementation of a national research evaluation system (RES). More specifically, we investigate the extent to which researchers at Aalborg University publish in prestigious journals in a period of ten years.en_US
dc.description.abstractDifferent yardsticks were used to measure the prestige of publications; an internal yardstick and several external yardsticks. The internal yardstick has been developed as part of the Bibliometric Research Indicator, namely the Authority List of Journals. The external yardsticks are the share of publications in Web of Science and Scopus and their measures of prestige, namely the Journal Impact Factor (JIF) and the Source Normalised Impact per Paper (SNIP).-
dc.description.abstractThe results regarding the publishing activity as measured by the national Danish RES show that the share of publications without level decreases, the share of publications in ‘normal’ (level 1) journals increases and the share of publications in ‘prestigious’ (level 2) journals is status quo. The results regarding the publishing activity measured in relation to external yardsticks show that Aalborg University has had a relative larger increase than Denmark and Norway in the amount of Scopus publications. Aalborg University has also had a larger increase than Denmark in the amount of WOS publications. The results also show that Aalborg University has published in slightly more prestigious journals if measured by JIF and SNIP. However, we do not have evidence supporting the assumption underlying the implementation of the Bibliometric Research Indicator, namely an increase in publications in prestigious journals.-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCRIS2012: 11th International Conference on Current Research Information Systems (Prague, June 6-9, 2012)-
dc.subjectresearch assessmenten_US
dc.subjectnational research evaluation systemsen_US
dc.subjectpublishing patternsen_US
dc.subjectAalborg Universityen_US
dc.titleResearch Performance Management in a CRIS Environment: Does Research Evaluation Affect Publishing Activity?en_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.relation.conferenceCRIS2012 Conferenceen
item.openairetypeConference Paper-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Conference
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
CRIS2012_Lunn_publishing.pdf716.51 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s) 50

Last Week
Last month
checked on Oct 27, 2021

Download(s) 50

checked on Oct 27, 2021

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are offered under a CC-BY 4.0 licence unless otherwise indicated