Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Current Research Information as Part of Digital Libraries and the Heterogeneity Problem||Authors:||Krause, Jürgen||Keywords:||virtual library;current research information;content analysis;metadata;heterogeneity;text-fact integration;multimodality;ELVIRA;CARMEN;ViBSoz;ETB||Issue Date:||Aug-2002||Publisher:||euroCRIS
Kassel University Press
|Source:||Wolfgang Adamczak, Annemarie Nase (eds.), "Gaining Insight from Research Information": Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Current Research Information Systems (2002), p. 21-31||Series/Report no.:||CRIS2002: 6th International Conference on Current Research Information Systems (Kassel, August 29-31, 2002)||Conference:||CRIS2002 Conference||Abstract:||
Users of scientific information are now faced with a highly decentralized, heterogeneous document base with varied content analysis methods. Traditional providers of information such as libraries or information centers have been increasingly joined by scientists themselves, who are developing independent services of varying scope, relevance and type of development in the WWW. Theoretically, groups that have gathered current research information (CRI), literature or factual information on specialized subjects can emerge anywhere in the world. One consequence of this is the presence of various inconsistencies:
- Relevant, quality-controlled data can be found right next to irrelevant and perhaps demonstrably erroneous data.
- In a system of this kind, descriptor A can assume the most disparate meanings. Even in the narrower context of specialized information, descriptor A, which has been extracted in an intellectually and qualitatively correct manner, and with much care and attention, from a highly relevant document, is not to be compared with a term A that has been provided by automatic indexing in some peripheral area.
Thus, the main problem to be solved is as follows: users must be supplied with heterogeneous data from different sources, modalities and content analysis processes via a visual user interface without inconsistencies in content analysis, for example, seriously impairing the quality of the search results. A scientist who, for example, is looking for social science information on subject X does not first want to search the social science
literature database SOLIS and the current research database FORIS, and then the library catalogues of
the special compilation area of social sciences at the library catalogues and in the WWW – each time using different search strategies. He wants to phrase his search query only once in the terminology to which he is accustomed without dealing with the remaining problems.
Closer analysis of this problems shows that narrow technological concepts, even if they are undoubtedly necessary, are not sufficient on their own. They must be supplemented by new conceptual considerations relating to the treatment of breaks in consistency between the different processes of content analysis. Acceptable solutions are only obtained when both aspects are combined. The IZ research group (Bonn, Germany) is working on this aspect in four different projects: Carmen, ViBSoz, ELVIRA and the ETB project. Initial solutions for transfer modules are available now and will be discussed.
Keynote delivered at the CRIS2002 Conference in Kassel.-- 11 pages.-- Contains: Conference paper (PDF) + PPT presentation.
|Appears in Collections:||Conference|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
Page view(s) 50191
checked on Aug 13, 2020
checked on Aug 13, 2020
Items in DSpace are offered under a CC-BY 4.0 licence unless otherwise indicated