Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11366/651
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLambert, Simonen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-08T21:31:21Z-
dc.date.available2018-05-08T21:31:21Z-
dc.date.issued2018-06-14-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11366/651-
dc.descriptionExtended abstract accepted at the CRIS2018 Conference.-- See event programme at http://www.cris2018.se/schedule/en_US
dc.description.abstractThe scope of Current Research Information Systems (CRIS) has expanded over the years, as have the standards and technologies to support them. From being conceived mainly as internal systems for research management, the emphasis has shifted to interoperability and combining data from diverse sources. Technological developments have enabled this expansion, but a particular driver has been the trend to open science on a global scale, with transparent access to the artefacts of the research process made available for examination and reuse. The growth in repositories of publications and datasets has fuelled both the need and the opportunity for facilitating the research process through locating and making reusable these artefacts, which requires models, techniques and tools capable of handling the necessary connections at scale. (See https://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/index.cfm for the European Commission’s view on implementation of Open Science),en_US
dc.description.abstractThe view of the CERIF standard, underpinning many CRISs, reflects this evolution: ‘Today CERIF is used as a model for implementation of a standalone CRIS (but interoperation ready), as a model to define the wrapper around a legacy non-CERIF CRIS to allow homogeneous access to heterogeneous systems and as a definition of a data exchange format to create a common data warehouse from several CRIS.’ (euroCRIS, ‘Main features of CERIF’)-
dc.description.abstractIn parallel, another development has been taking place: the growth of persistent identifiers for a wide range of entities in the research domain, both in the digital and physical worlds. DOIs for publications and datasets and ORCID ids for individual researchers are now securely established, indeed indispensable parts of the research landscape, with their key features of being resolvable and having associated metadata. Taking the idea of PIDs to an extreme is the ‘Global Digital Object Cloud’ (RDA Data Fabric Interest Group, ‘Global Digital Object Cloud (DOC) - A Guiding Vision’), putting (virtualised) digital objects centre-stage and giving PIDs a crucial role in accessing and managing them.-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publishereuroCRISen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCRIS2018: 14th International Conference on Current Research Information Systems (Umeå, June 13-16, 2018)-
dc.subjectcurrent research information systemsen_US
dc.subjectopen scienceen_US
dc.subjectsystem interoperabilityen_US
dc.subjectCERIFen_US
dc.subjectpersistent identifiersen_US
dc.titleCRIS and persistent identifiers: how do they work together?en_US
dc.typePresentationen_US
dc.relation.conferenceCRIS2018 – Umeåen_US
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypePresentation-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
Appears in Collections:Conference
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Lambert_CRIS2018_paper_CRIS_and_persistent_identifiers.pdfExtended abstract (PDF)146.74 kBAdobe PDF
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s) 10

700
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Download(s) 50

304
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are offered under a CC-BY 4.0 licence unless otherwise indicated