Repository logo
Digital Collections
Research Outputs
People
Organizations
DRIS
Statistics
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. EuroCRIS Research Output
  3. Conference
  4. The registration of art and design research outcomes: Visualizing the invisible (Case study: The Flemish FRIS-registration format)

The registration of art and design research outcomes: Visualizing the invisible (Case study: The Flemish FRIS-registration format)

Author(s)
Keywords

research information ...

research evaluation

non-written outputs

Issue Date
June 15, 2018
Publisher
euroCRIS
Type
Presentation
Abstract
Research evaluation practices - and the measurement of research quality and impact they imply - are being looked at from very different angles. For research information managers transparency and access probably constitute the most urgent issues at the current moment, while R&D directors and research policymakers devote their attention to the ethical consequences and practical implications of open access and open data (NordFosk, 2016). There is another important pressing preoccupation of the latter group, namely the validity and robustness of current research evaluation protocols.
Existing research evaluation models all depart from registered data in institutional and/or research policy CRIS. The most heard concern in research management circles relates to the identification and implementation of systematically collected and well-documented objective metrics for impact measurement, especially societal impact measurement (Bornmann, 2013). A second worry in the same midst has to do with the steady rise, both proportionally as with regard to policy appreciation, of practice-based research. In sharp contrast to the standard practice of communicating research results in the form of publications, outcomes resulting from applied research often are not communicated through writing but rather take on quite different dissemination forms. Registration systems for non-written output of national evaluation frameworks, research funding agencies etc. are not always open and considerate towards non-written output. Within these databases, non-written outcomes lack a systematic informative organization, therefore visibility and as a result thereof recognition in terms of quality and impact valuation (and the subsequent funding that is attached to that).
Description
Extended abstract accepted at the CRIS2018 Conference.-- See event programme at http://www.cris2018.se/schedule/
URI
https://dspacecris.eurocris.org/handle/11366/681
File(s)
Thumbnail Image
Name

Martens_VanDenBerghe_CRIS2018_paper_Art_and_design_research_outcomes.pdf

Description
Extended abstract (PDF)
Size

296.02 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

2542e83912d58f09ce8591cc85214f95

Related items
Metrics
Conference(s)
euroCRIS

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Accessibility settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
Repository logo COAR Notify